抖音首席执行官周寿子在众议院能源和商务委员会作证，加入《华盛顿邮报》记者的行列。此次听证会召开之际，拜登政府正加大对TikTok的中国所有者字节跳动的压力，要求其出售该视频分享平台。这位TikTok首席执行官首次在国会露面，预计将面临有关该公司与中国的联系以及网络对年轻人潜在危害的问题。
自推出以来的七年里，TikTok的受欢迎程度迅速上升，在2022年成为美国下载量最高的应用程序。批评人士认为，TikTok的中国母公司字节跳动(ByteDance)使该应用程序成为国家安全威胁，可能会允许它分享有关其美国用户的数据，或按照北京的要求操纵其算法。
1:Tiktok is a big deal right now and the Congress handled this HORRIBLY. I’m honestly embarrassed for us
抖音现在是一个大问题，而国会处理得很糟糕。我真的为我们感到尴尬
2:Can someone please tell me why Congress won’t let Mr Chu actually ANSWER the questions he’s been asked? This is giving me a headache!
谁能告诉我为什么国会不让朱先生回答他被问到的问题?这让我头疼!
3:The stark difference in how they treated Mr. Chew vs how they treated Mr. Zuckerberg is honestly enraging. Considering the fact that, yes, the two hearings were covering different allegations against each platform, a lot of the privacy and security concerns are similar. So it's really disheartening to see this sort of treatment and blatant disrespect directed at someone who was there to ANSWER questions and not be talked over. I almost felt like there needed to be a lawyer present to object a lot of these questions that were just leading, compound, argumentative, vague and/ or worded in a way where the CEO would HAVE to reword it in order to give an honest answer. This hearing was ridiculous on many accounts and honestly a disservice to the people who actually wanted answers on how Tiktok operates in the US.
他们对待周先生和对待扎克伯格先生的截然不同确实令人愤怒。考虑到这两个听证会涵盖了针对每个平台的不同指控，很多隐私和安全问题是相似的。所以，看到这样的待遇和公然的不尊重针对一个在那里回答问题而不是被谈论的人，真的很令人沮丧。我几乎觉得需要一个律师在场，来反对这些问题，这些问题只是引导，复杂，争论，模糊和/或措辞，CEO必须重新措辞才能给出诚实的答案。这场听证会在很多方面都很荒谬，老实说，对那些真正想知道Tiktok在美国是如何运作的人来说，这是一种伤害。
4:The entire congress is embarrassing
- 整个国会都很尴尬
版权声明：内容来源于互联网和用户投稿 如有侵权请联系删除